SPRINT

SPRINT showed that in high-risk adults with hypertension but without diabetes or prior stroke, targeting SBP <120 mmHg reduced major cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality compared with SBP <140 mmHg, at the cost of more hypotension, syncope, electrolyte abnormalities, and AKI.

Study design

  • Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial
  • N = 9,361
  • Adults with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk
  • Randomized to intensive vs standard SBP target
  • Median follow-up 3.26 years
  • Stopped early due to benefit in the intensive-treatment group

Population

Included
  • Age ≥50 years
  • SBP 130-180 mmHg
  • Increased CV risk
  • Clinical or subclinical CVD, CKD, Framingham 10-year risk ≥15%, or age ≥75
Excluded
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Prior stroke
  • Symptomatic HF or LVEF <35%
  • Standing SBP <110 mmHg
  • Nursing home residence
Mean age 68 28% age ≥75 36% women 28% CKD No diabetes No prior stroke

Interventions

Intensive BP control
  • Target SBP <120 mmHg
  • Achieved mean SBP at 1 year: 121.4 mmHg
  • Mean BP meds during follow-up: 2.8
Standard BP control
  • Target SBP <140 mmHg
  • Achieved mean SBP at 1 year: 136.2 mmHg
  • Mean BP meds during follow-up: 1.8

Primary outcome

  • Composite of MI, ACS without MI, stroke, acute decompensated HF, or CV death
  • 1.65% per year with intensive treatment vs 2.19% per year with standard treatment
  • HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89
  • P < 0.001

SBP <120 vs SBP <140

Primary composite endpoint, annualized event rate

2.4% 1.8% 1.2% 0.6% 0%
1.65%
SBP <120
2.19%
SBP <140
1.65%/yr vs 2.19%/yr | HR 0.75

Primary composite: MI, ACS without MI, stroke, acute decompensated HF, or CV death.

Secondary outcomes

Outcome Intensive Standard Effect
All-cause mortality 1.03% per year 1.40% per year HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.90
CV death 0.25% per year 0.43% per year HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85
Heart failure 0.41% per year 0.67% per year HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.84

Safety

  • Overall serious adverse events were similar between groups
  • Intensive treatment increased several treatment-related adverse events
Adverse event Intensive Standard
Hypotension 2.4% 1.4%
Syncope 2.3% 1.7%
Electrolyte abnormality 3.1% 2.3%
AKI or acute renal failure 4.1% 2.5%
Injurious falls 2.2% 2.3%
Practical point: SPRINT used automated office BP measurements, which may read lower than routine clinic BP. Do not blindly chase SBP <120 in frail, orthostatic, multimorbid, or symptomatic patients.

Interpretation

  • For selected high-risk hypertensive adults, lower SBP targets reduce CV events and mortality.
  • The strongest clinical signal was fewer HF events, CV deaths, and all-cause deaths.
  • The tradeoff is more medication burden and more hypotension, syncope, electrolyte issues, and AKI.
  • SPRINT does not directly apply to patients with diabetes, prior stroke, symptomatic HF, or nursing home-level frailty.
Citation: SPRINT Research Group. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373:2103-2116. NEJM