PE Risk & Treatment Tool
Based on 2026 AHA/ACC PE guidelines
1
2
3
4
5
Step 1
Incidental and asymptomatic PE?
Step 2
Hemodynamic status
Step 3
PESI Score
Age
Total PESI Score
Enter age to calculate
0
Class B
Clot location
Class C
RV dysfunction and biomarkers
RV dysfunction present?
RV Dysfunction Reference
RV/LV >0.9
TAPSE <1.7 cm
TDI S′ <9.5 cm/s
TR velocity ≥2.9 m/s
Class D
Incipient cardiopulmonary failure
Transient hypotension?
Definitions
D1
SBP <90 mmHg or decrease >40 mmHg lasting <15 minutes, or hypotension responsive to intervention without persistent end-organ hypoperfusion.
SBP <90 mmHg or decrease >40 mmHg lasting <15 minutes, or hypotension responsive to intervention without persistent end-organ hypoperfusion.
D2
Normotensive shock with RV failure and evidence of hypoperfusion despite preserved systemic blood pressure.
Normotensive shock with RV failure and evidence of hypoperfusion despite preserved systemic blood pressure.
Class E
Cardiopulmonary failure
Treatment
Anticoagulation
DOAC preferred over warfarin
LMWH preferred over UFH for C1–E1
APS: warfarin
Pregnancy: LMWH or UFH
Persistent symptoms >3 months: evaluate for CTEPD
2026 Acute PE Clinical Categories
Category A- Subclinical PE
- Incidental and asymptomatic PE
- Treatment
- Discharge home on AC (DOAC preferred)
Category B- Symptomatic/ Low Risk
- Symptomatic PE with PESI < 85
- B1: subsegmental PE
- B2: includes segmental or more proximal PE
- Treatment
- Admission is not required. If admitting treat with LMWH then DOAC on discharge
Category C- Symptomatic/ Elevated Risk
- Symptomatic PE with PESI > 85
- C1: normal RV function and normal cardiac biomarkers
- C2: abnormal RV function OR an abnormal cardiac biomarker
- C3: abnormal RV function AND an abnormal cardiac biomarker
- Treatment
- Admit to hospital and start LMWH
Category D - Incipient Cardiopulmonary Failure
- Patients approaching failure or exhibiting “normotensive shock”
- D1: Transient hypotension: Systolic BP <90 or drop >40 lasting <15 min or that responds to volume expansion with no signs of end-organ hypoperfusion.
- D2: Normotensive shock: Normal BP but markers of hypoperfusion present, lactate >2, AKI, UOP <720mL in 24h, AMS or cardiac index <2.2, MAP<60
- Treatment
- Admit to ICU or step-down. Consider thrombectomy/lysis (class IIb recommendation)
Category E- Cardiopulmonary Failure
- Hemodynamics collapse/Cardiogenic shock
- E1: Recurrent or persistent hypotension with cardiogenic shock (SCAI stage C)
- E2: Refractory cardiogenic shock (SCAI D-E) or cardiac arrest
- Treatment
- ICU. Immediate PERT activation. Systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy or ECMO are reasonable (Class IIa)
Respiratory Modifier
- The guideline also adds an R modifier for clinically important respiratory compromise.
- C: O2<90%, RR>=30, or need supplemental O2
- D: >6L NC or use of NRB
- E: Hypoxemic respiratory failure
PESI and HESTIA
- PESI remains useful for estimating clinical severity in symptomatic PE. A low clinical severity score (PESI < 85) helps identify Category B patients, while elevated clinical severity (PESI >85) helps identify Category C patients. Hemodynamic compromise takes priority over PESI and moves the patient into Category D or E.
- HESTIA is 11-step questionnaire to determine eligibility for outpatient management of Category A and B patients. If you answer "yes" to any of the 11-questions you should consider inpatient admission.
Treatment
- Category A and B patients may be appropriate for outpatient treatment or early discharge when there are no other reasons for hospitalization.
- Category C patients generally require hospitalization and therapeutic anticoagulation. Routine reperfusion therapy is not recommended in clinically stable patients.
- Category D patients require close monitoring and early multidisciplinary PE evaluation. Advanced PE therapy may be considered depending on the clinical trajectory.
- Category E patients require urgent critical care management and evaluation for reperfusion therapy such as systemic thrombolysis, catheter based therapy, mechanical thrombectomy, or surgical embolectomy.
- For oral anticoagulation, DOACs are preferred over vitamin K antagonists when appropriate. When initial parenteral anticoagulation is needed, LMWH is preferred over unfractionated heparin in most patients.
- The new classification provides a more practical continuum from low severity PE through cardiopulmonary failure and is designed to guide monitoring intensity, disposition, anticoagulation, and escalation to advanced PE therapy.
Initial Assessment & Management by Acute PE Clinical Category
Hover over a category to highlight its recommended assessment and management
Showing recommendations for
Initiate DOAC
I
Initiate LMWH
I
Initiate LMWH or UFH
I
Use PESI to assess short-term risk
I
Measure at least 1 cardiac biomarker
I
Measure lactate
I
Evaluate RV size and function with CT and/or echocardiography
I
Use HESTIA score to identify suitability for outpatient treatment
IIa
Use PESI score to identify the higher-risk patient
IIa
Evaluate for normotensive shock
IIa
Multidisciplinary PERT assessment to guide clinical management
I
Vasopressor and/or inotropic therapy
I
Systemic thrombolysis if acceptable bleeding risk, catheter-directed thrombolysis, or mechanical thrombectomy in appropriate cases
IIb
Systemic thrombolysis if acceptable bleeding risk, catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or surgical embolectomy
IIa
Systemic thrombolysis if acceptable bleeding risk
IIa
Consider VA-ECMO
IIa
Class I
Recommended
Class IIa
Reasonable
Class IIb
May be considered
Mechanical Thrombectomy vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis
- PEERLESS trial: Mechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis had similar short-term mortality.
- Mechanical thrombectomy showed a favorable signal for some clinical outcomes, although it did not demonstrate a clear mortality benefit.
Anticoagulation
- If parenteral anticoagulation is required, LMWH is preferred over UFH because of lower recurrent VTE and bleeding risk.
- DOACs are preferred over warfarin for most patients eligible for oral anticoagulation.
- Special Populations
- Antiphospholipid syndrome: Warfarin is preferred.
- CKD stage 2–3: DOAC therapy is generally preferred when otherwise appropriate.
- Pregnancy: LMWH is preferred. UFH is an alternative when indicated.
Vasopressors and Other Meds
- Norepinephrine is the preferred initial vasopressor.
- At higher norepinephrine requirements, increasing catecholamine doses may increase pulmonary vascular resistance (>15mcg/min)
- Consider adding a second vasopressor such as vasopressin rather than continuing to escalate norepinephrine alone.
- Pulmonary Vasodilators
- Class IIb: In selected patients with Category C2 through E, pulmonary vasodilator therapy may be considered.
Advanced Therapy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism by Risk Category
| PE Category | Systemic Thrombolysis | Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis | Mechanical Thrombectomy | Surgical Embolectomy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A–C1 | Class III: Harm Level of Evidence A | Class III: No Benefit Level of Evidence C, Expert Opinion | Class III: No Benefit Level of Evidence C, Expert Opinion | Class III: No Benefit Level of Evidence C, Expert Opinion |
| C2 | Class III: Harm Level of Evidence B, Randomized | Class IIb: Benefit Uncertain Level of Evidence C, Limited Data | Class IIb: Benefit Uncertain Level of Evidence C, Limited Data | Class III: No Benefit Level of Evidence C, Expert Opinion |
| C3 | Class IIb: Benefit Uncertain Level of Evidence C, Limited Data | Class IIb: Benefit Uncertain Level of Evidence C, Limited Data | Class IIb: Benefit Uncertain Level of Evidence C, Limited Data | Class III: No Benefit Level of Evidence C, Expert Opinion |
| D1–D2 | Class IIb: May Be Considered Level of Evidence C, Limited Data | Class IIb: May Be Considered Level of Evidence B, Nonrandomized | Class IIb: May Be Considered Level of Evidence B, Nonrandomized | Class IIb: Benefit Uncertain Level of Evidence C, Limited Data |
| E1 | Class IIa: Reasonable Level of Evidence C, Limited Data | Class IIb: May Be Considered Level of Evidence B, Nonrandomized | Class IIb: May Be Considered Level of Evidence B, Nonrandomized | Class IIb: May Be Considered Level of Evidence C, Limited Data |
| E2 | Class IIa: Reasonable Level of Evidence C, Limited Data | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | Class III: No Benefit Level of Evidence B, Nonrandomized |
| Clot-in-Transit | Class IIa: Advanced Therapies Are Reasonable | |||
Class IIa
Reasonable
Class IIb
May be considered / benefit uncertain
Class III
No benefit or harm
CTEPD, Not Just CTEPH
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) represents a broader spectrum than CTEPH.
- CTEPD can cause persistent symptoms and functional limitation with or without pulmonary hypertension.
- CTEPH is the subset of CTEPD associated with pulmonary hypertension.
- Class I: Patients with persistent dyspnea, exercise intolerance, or other PE-related symptoms >3 months after acute PE should be evaluated for CTEPD.
- Evaluation may include:
- TTE
- V/Q scan
- CPET
- Additional pulmonary vascular evaluation when indicated
Duration of Anticoagulation
- No Major Reversible Risk Factor
- After a first PE without a major reversible provoking factor, extending anticoagulation beyond the initial 3–6 months is recommended when bleeding risk is acceptable.
- Persistent Risk Factor
- Extended anticoagulation is recommended when a persistent risk factor remains.
- Major Reversible Risk Factor
- If the PE occurred in the setting of a major reversible provoking factor, anticoagulation can generally be stopped after the initial 3–6 month treatment phase.
References
1
Creager MA, Barnes GD, Giri J, et al.
2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN
guideline for the evaluation and management of acute pulmonary
embolism in adults.
Circulation. 2026;153.
doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001415.
View guideline ↗
View guideline ↗
Primary Guideline
2
Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al.
SCAI SHOCK stage classification expert consensus update:
a review and incorporation of validation studies.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(9):933-946.
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018.
View SCAI consensus ↗
View SCAI consensus ↗
SCAI Shock Staging
3
Jaber WA, Gonsalves CF, Stortecky S, et al.
Large-bore mechanical thrombectomy versus catheter-directed
thrombolysis in the management of intermediate-risk pulmonary
embolism: primary results of the PEERLESS randomized controlled
trial.
Circulation. 2025;151(5):260-273.
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072364.
View PEERLESS trial ↗
View PEERLESS trial ↗
PEERLESS
4
Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, et al.
Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary
embolism.
N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1402-1411.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1302097.
View PEITHO trial ↗
View PEITHO trial ↗
Systemic Thrombolysis
5
Rosenfield K, et al.
Ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed fibrinolysis for
acute pulmonary embolism.
N Engl J Med. 2026.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2516567.
View HI-PEITHO trial ↗
View HI-PEITHO trial ↗
Catheter-Directed Therapy
6
Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al.
Simplification of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index for
prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary
embolism.
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(15):1383-1389.
View study ↗
View study ↗
PESI / Risk Assessment