HOCM

HOCM TTE Algorithm

TTE Morphology

Look for asymmetric septal hypertrophy, small hyperdynamic LV cavity, elongated MV, abnormal papillary muscles, and LAE

Look for Dynamic Obstruction

Assess for SAM - then interrogate the LVOT with Doppler

Interpret the Doppler Pattern

Late-peaking dagger-shaped CW Doppler supports dynamic LVOT obstruction rather than AS

Measure Resting and Provoked Gradient

If resting gradient is low, use Valsalva

Obstructive HCM Pattern

SAM plus significant resting or provoked LVOT gradient, often with posteriorly directed MR

Nonobstructive HCM Pattern

Hypertrophic phenotype present, but no major resting or provoked LVOT gradient

Mitral Valve / MR

Look for SAM-related MR and leaflet or papillary muscle abnormalities

Diastolic Burden

Assess LA size and diastolic dysfunction

Exclude Mimics

Differentiate from AS, hypertensive LVH, sigmoid septum, and subaortic membrane

Report max wall thickness, hypertrophy pattern, presence of SAM, resting/provoked LVOT gradient, MR, LA size, and diastology

  • In A5C, A3C and subcostal views
    • Peak instantaneous LVOT gradient using CW Doppler
    • Convert velocity to gradient: Peak ΔP (mmHg) = 4 × (Vmax in m/s)²
    • Report rest and provoked values, and specify the provocation method

How to acquire it correctly


  • Use color Doppler first to locate aliasing/turbulence in LVOT
  • Place CW Doppler cursor through LVOT, aligned as parallel to flow as possible
  • Sweep multiple windows and pick the highest Vmax (best aligned, cleanest envelope)
  • Optimize settings: higher sweep speed, appropriate gain to avoid blooming, avoid under-gaining (you will clip the peak)

How to confirm it is LVOT and not MR


  • LVOT obstruction: “dagger-shaped” late-peaking systolic CW envelope
  • MR: denser, often earlier-peaking signal that extends into/through systole (may appear more holosystolic), usually higher velocity than LVOT
  • If unsure, compare timing and shape, and correlate with color jet direction and MR severity
  • Use PW Doppler mapping: step from LVOT toward apex to localize the site of acceleration (helps distinguish mid-cavity vs LVOT)

What to report


  • Resting LVOT Vmax and peak gradient (mmHg)
  • Provoked LVOT Vmax and peak gradient, plus provocation method
  • Presence/absence of SAM of MV and severity of MR (qualitative is fine)
  • If mid-cavity obstruction: state location and report peak gradient there (and clarify it is mid-cavity, not LVOT)
Gradient Severity
Category Peak Gradient (mmHg)
Normal <10
Borderline 10–30
Abnormal (non-obstructive) 30–49
Obstructive (clinically significant) ≥50 (rest or provoked)

Provocative Testing


  • Valsalva or exercise can unmask gradients ≥50 mmHg in symptomatic patients
  • These thresholds guide decisions for septal reduction therapies

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction occurs when fast-flowing blood through the LV outflow tract pulls the mitral valve anteriorly due to a Venturi effect. This phenomenon is called systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve.

SAM leads to 2 key consequences

  • Outflow obstruction
    • The anteriorly displaced mitral valve obstructs the LV outflow tract
    • This impairs systolic ejection into the aorta, reducing cardiac output
    • Can lead to hypotension or cardiogenic shock
  • Mitral regurgitation

TTE


  • Septal hypertrophy (often asymmetric, IVS ≥15 mm)
  • Systolic anterior motion (SAM) of mitral valve
  • Dynamic obstruction: Late-peaking “dagger-shaped” continuous-wave Doppler curve
  • Mitral regurgitation: Posteriorly directed jet due to SAM
  • Hyperkinetic LV: Often with near obliteration of the left ventricular cavity during systole
Prior Event
(SCD, VF, Sustained VT)
ICD recommended (Class I)
≥1 of:
  • FH SCD
  • Massive LVH
  • Unexplained syncope
  • Apical aneurysm
  • EF ≤50%
ICD reasonable (Class IIa)
NSVT
Extensive LGE (CMR)
ICD may be considered (Class IIb)
ICD not indicated (Class III)
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
Children
Adults

HCM- SCD Calculator

Ages 16-80
Age
years
Maximum LV Wall Thickness
mm
LA Size
mm
Max LVOT Gradient
mmHg
Risk Factors for Sudden Cardiac Death
FH SCD
NSVT
Unexplained Syncope
EF ≤ 50%
Apical Aneurysm
Extensive LGE
Risk of SCD at 5 years (%)
0.0%
Recommendation